For consumers, when they first come into contact with the wedding hall, they will inevitably have doubts while feeling the beauty of the scene - the banquet hall has become a fixed arrangement, and they can no longer choose the wedding company. Is this monopoly?
From a legal point of view, as long as the consumer has not paid for the wedding banquet and has been informed that the wedding hall arrangement has been fixed and cannot be changed to another wedding company, it does not constitute a monopoly, and can be considered a bundling sale from a commercial point of view. The consumer has the right to choose another restaurant to hold the wedding, so there is no legal risk for the operation of the wedding hall.
The consumer's doubts still need to be considered to the fullest extent to avoid unnecessary misunderstandings. When customers inquire, it is necessary to inform them that the wedding hall does not support them to find a wedding company. At the same time, if the restaurant has conditions and there are enough halls, one hall can be left out and not installed as a wedding hall for customers to decide.